Riabilitazione full-arch e All-on-4

Quanto se ne scrive

Articoli pubblicati per anno. Nell’ultimo decennio ne sono usciti 3.8× rispetto ai dieci anni precedenti.

Revisioni sistematiche, meta-analisi e consensus

Dove la letteratura tira le somme. Se hai poco tempo, si comincia da qui.

1. 1.
   The all-on-four treatment concept: Systematic review

   Soto-Peñaloza D, Zaragozí-Alonso R, Peñarrocha-Diago M, et al. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(3):e474-e488

   204 citazioni PubMed 28298995 doi:10.4317/jced.53613 testo libero

2. 2.
   Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla.

   Lambert F, Weber H, Susarla SM, et al. J Periodontol. 2009;80(8):1220-30

   148 citazioni PubMed 19656021 doi:10.1902/jop.2009.090109

3. 3.
   The all-on-four treatment concept: a systematic review.

   Patzelt S, Bahat O, Reynolds M, et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(6):836-55

   135 citazioni PubMed 23560986 doi:10.1111/cid.12068

4. 4.
   Bone Augmentation of the Edentulous Maxilla for Implant Placement: A Systematic Review.

   Aghaloo T, Misch C, Lin G, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31 Suppl:s19-30

   133 citazioni PubMed 27228250 doi:10.11607/jomi.16suppl.g1 testo libero

5. 5.
   A systematic review of implant-supported overdentures in the edentulous maxilla, compared to the mandible: how many implants?

   Raghoebar G, Meijer H, Slot W, et al. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7 Suppl 2:S191-201

   126 citazioni PubMed 24977255

6. 6.
   Loading protocols for implant-supported overdentures in the edentulous jaw: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

   Schimmel M, Srinivasan M, Herrmann FR, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:271-86

   126 citazioni PubMed 24660203 doi:10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g4.4 testo libero

7. 7.
   Endodontics or implants? A review of decisive criteria and guidelines for single tooth restorations and full arch reconstructions.

   Zitzmann N, Krastl G, Hecker H, et al. Int Endod J. 2009;42(9):757-74

   123 citazioni PubMed 19548936 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01561.x testo libero

8. 8.
   Systematic review of short- (5-10 years) and long-term (10 years or more) survival and success of full-arch fixed dental hybrid prostheses and supporting implants.

   Kwon T, Bain P, Levin L. J Dent. 2014;42(10):1228-41

   119 citazioni PubMed 24975989 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.016

I lavori più citati di sempre

I riferimenti che tutti gli altri citano. Alcuni hanno trent’anni e restano il fondamento della tecnica.

9. 9.
   "All-on-Four" immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study.

   Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:2-9

   747 citazioni PubMed 12691645 doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x

10. 10.
    All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study.

    Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S88-94

    539 citazioni PubMed 16137093 doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00080.x

11. 11.
    Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years.

    Kallus T, Bessing C. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9(2):169-78

    380 citazioni PubMed 8206552

12. 12.
    Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses

    Schrott A, Jimenez M, Hwang J, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(10):1170-1177

    297 citazioni PubMed 19719741 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01795.x testo libero

13. 13.
    Direct implant loading in the edentulous maxilla using a bone density-adapted surgical protocol and primary implant stability criteria for inclusion.

    Ostman P, Hellman M, Sennerby L. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S60-9

    281 citazioni PubMed 16137089 doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00076.x

14. 14.
    A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up.

    Maló P, Nobre MADA, Lopes A, et al. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142(3):310-20

    272 citazioni PubMed 21357865 doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0170

15. 15.
    "All-on-4" immediate-function concept for completely edentulous maxillae: a clinical report on the medium (3 years) and long-term (5 years) outcomes.

    Maló P, Nobre MADA, Lopes A, et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14 Suppl 1:e139-50

    266 citazioni PubMed 22008153 doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00395.x

16. 16.
    The all-on-four treatment concept: Systematic review

    Soto-Peñaloza D, Zaragozí-Alonso R, Peñarrocha-Diago M, et al. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2017;9:e474-e488

    204 citazioni PubMed 28298995 doi:10.4317/jced.53613 testo libero

17. 17.
    Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design.

    Zitzmann N, Marinello C. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82(2):188-96

    177 citazioni PubMed 10424983 doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70155-1

18. 18.
    Immediate occlusal loading and tilted implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: 1-year interim results of a multicenter prospective study.

    Testori T, Fabbro MD, Capelli M, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(3):227-32

    172 citazioni PubMed 18177428 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01472.x testo libero

19. 19.
    Accuracy of implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw: analysis of precision of fit between cast gold-alloy frameworks and master casts by means of a three-dimensional photogrammetric technique.

    Jemt T, Lie A. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6(3):172-80

    172 citazioni PubMed 7578793 doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060306.x

20. 20.
    An In Vitro Study of Factors Influencing the Performance of Digital Intraoral Impressions Operating on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology with Multiple Implants in the Edentulous Maxilla

    Gimenez-Gonzalez B, Hassan B, Özcan M, et al. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(8):650–655

    167 citazioni PubMed 26934046 doi:10.1111/jopr.12457 testo libero

21. 21.
    Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study

    Mangano F, Admakin O, Bonacina M, et al. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):263

    161 citazioni PubMed 32962680 doi:10.1186/s12903-020-01254-9 testo libero

22. 22.
    Reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with free iliac crest grafts and implants: a 3-year report of a prospective clinical study.

    Sjöström M, Sennerby L, Nilson H, et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007;9(1):46-59

    161 citazioni PubMed 17362496 doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00034.x testo libero

23. 23.
    A three-year follow-up report of a comparative study of ITI Dental Implants and Brånemark System implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla.

    Åstrand P, Engquist B, Anzén B, et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(3):130-41

    154 citazioni PubMed 15726847 doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00213.x

24. 24.
    Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five-year follow-up report.

    Jemt T. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5(3):142-7

    152 citazioni PubMed 7827228 doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050304.x

25. 25.
    Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.

    Katsoulis J, Pazera P, Mericske-Stern R. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11(3):238-45

    151 citazioni PubMed 18783423 doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00110.x

26. 26.
    Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study.

    Bhering C, Mesquita M, Kemmoku D, et al. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;69:715-25

    150 citazioni PubMed 27612765 doi:10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.059

27. 27.
    Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla.

    Lambert F, Weber H, Susarla SM, et al. The Journal of Periodontology. 2009;80(8):1220-30

    148 citazioni PubMed 19656021 doi:10.1902/jop.2009.090109

28. 28.
    A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years.

    Aparicio C, Ouazzani W, García R, et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(3):114-22

    144 citazioni PubMed 16919019 doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00009.x

Gli ultimi tre anni

Cosa è uscito di recente, ordinato per quanto è già stato citato.

29. 29.
    Accuracy of edentulous full-arch implant impression: An in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry.

    Cheng J, Zhang H, Liu H, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024;35(5):560-572

    79 citazioni PubMed 38421115 doi:10.1111/clr.14252 testo libero

30. 30.
    Evaluation of surgical techniques in survival rate and complications of zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: a systematic review

    Kämmerer PW, Fan S, Aparicio C, et al. Int J Implant Dent. 2023;9(1):11

    57 citazioni PubMed 37198345 doi:10.1186/s40729-023-00478-y testo libero

31. 31.
    Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.

    Ke Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. J Dent. 2023;135:104561

    50 citazioni PubMed 37236297 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104561

32. 32.
    In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols.

    Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Thulin M, et al. J Dent. 2023;128:104308

    48 citazioni PubMed 36481688 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104308 testo libero

33. 33.
    The accuracy of conventional versus digital (intraoral scanner or photogrammetry) impression techniques in full-arch implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review

    Joensahakij N, Serichetaphongse P, Chengprapakorn W. Evid Based Dent. 2024;25(4):216-217

    42 citazioni PubMed 39134687 doi:10.1038/s41432-024-01045-z

34. 34.
    Effect of different intraoral scanners and scanbody splinting on accuracy of scanning implant-supported full arch fixed prosthesis.

    Ashraf Y, Fadl AAE, Hamdy AM, et al. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(8):1257-1263

    34 citazioni PubMed 37310208 doi:10.1111/jerd.13070

35. 35.
    Autonomous robotic surgery for zygomatic implant placement and immediately loaded implant-supported full-arch prosthesis: a preliminary research

    Li C, Wang M, Deng H, et al. Int J Implant Dent. 2023;9(1):12

    33 citazioni PubMed 37204483 doi:10.1186/s40729-023-00474-2 testo libero

36. 36.
    Implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prostheses manufactured through a direct digital workflow using a calibrated splinting framework: A retrospective clinical study.

    Rustichini F, Romolini R, Salmi M, et al. J Dent. 2025;154:105605

    31 citazioni PubMed 39904473 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105605

37. 37.
    Occlusion and Biomechanical Risk Factors in Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prostheses—Narrative Review

    Berzaghi A, Testori T, Scaini R, et al. J Pers Med. 2025;15(2)

    31 citazioni PubMed 39997342 doi:10.3390/jpm15020065 testo libero

38. 38.
    Clinical evaluation of autonomous robotic-assisted full-arch implant surgery: A 1-year prospective clinical study.

    Xie R, Liu Y, Wei H, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024;35(4):443-453

    31 citazioni PubMed 38318691 doi:10.1111/clr.14243