Chirurgia implantare guidata e pianificazione digitale

Quanto se ne scrive

Articoli pubblicati per anno. Nell’ultimo decennio ne sono usciti 4.6× rispetto ai dieci anni precedenti.

Revisioni sistematiche, meta-analisi e consensus

Dove la letteratura tira le somme. Se hai poco tempo, si comincia da qui.

1. 1.
   Current state of the art of computer‐guided implant surgery

   D'Haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, et al. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):121–133

   496 citazioni PubMed 28000275 doi:10.1111/prd.12175

2. 2.
   Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review.

   Hultin M, Svensson K, Trulsson M. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:124-35

   209 citazioni PubMed 23062137 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02545.x

3. 3.
   CLINICAL FACTORS AFFECTING THE ACCURACY OF GUIDED IMPLANT SURGERY—A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS

   Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L, et al. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2017;18(1):28–40

   195 citazioni PubMed 29478680 doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.07.007

4. 4.
   Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials

   Colombo M, Mangano C, Mijiritsky E, et al. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):150

   184 citazioni PubMed 29237427 doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0441-y testo libero

5. 5.
   Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications.

   Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G, et al. Periodontol 2000. 2014;66(1):214-27

   157 citazioni PubMed 25123770 doi:10.1111/prd.12056 testo libero

6. 6.
   Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention.

   Tatakis D, Chien H, Parashis A. Periodontol 2000. 2019;81(1):194-208

   134 citazioni PubMed 31407433 doi:10.1111/prd.12292

7. 7.
   Reducing errors in guided implant surgery to optimize treatment outcomes.

   Chackartchi T, Romanos G, Párkányi L, et al. Periodontol 2000. 2022;88(1):64-72

   121 citazioni PubMed 35103317 doi:10.1111/prd.12411 testo libero

8. 8.
   A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery - data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing

   Kernen F, Kramer J, Wanner L, et al. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):251

   117 citazioni PubMed 32912273 doi:10.1186/s12903-020-01208-1 testo libero

I lavori più citati di sempre

I riferimenti che tutti gli altri citano. Alcuni hanno trent’anni e restano il fondamento della tecnica.

9. 9.
   Current state of the art of computer‐guided implant surgery

   D'Haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, et al. Periodontology 2000. 2017;73:121–133

   496 citazioni PubMed 28000275 doi:10.1111/prd.12175

10. 10.
    Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review.

    Hultin M, Svensson K, Trulsson M. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2012;23 Suppl 6:124-35

    209 citazioni PubMed 23062137 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02545.x

11. 11.
    Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans – A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides

    Flügge TV, Derksen W, Poel JT, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;28(9):1113-1118

    204 citazioni PubMed 27440381 doi:10.1111/clr.12925 testo libero

12. 12.
    CLINICAL FACTORS AFFECTING THE ACCURACY OF GUIDED IMPLANT SURGERY—A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS

    Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L, et al. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice. 2017;18:28–40

    195 citazioni PubMed 29478680 doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.07.007

13. 13.
    A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.

    Vercruyssen M, Cox C, Coucke W, et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(7):717-23

    185 citazioni PubMed 24460748 doi:10.1111/jcpe.12231 testo libero

14. 14.
    Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials

    Colombo M, Mangano C, Mijiritsky E, et al. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17

    184 citazioni PubMed 29237427 doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0441-y testo libero

15. 15.
    The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial.

    Kaewsiri D, Panmekiate S, Subbalekha K, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(6):505-514

    183 citazioni PubMed 31060099 doi:10.1111/clr.13435

16. 16.
    A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free‐handed, pilot‐drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients

    Younes F, Cosyn J, Bruyckere TD, et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(6):721–732

    179 citazioni PubMed 29608793 doi:10.1111/jcpe.12897

17. 17.
    Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications.

    Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G, et al. Periodontology 2000. 2014;66(1):214-27

    157 citazioni PubMed 25123770 doi:10.1111/prd.12056 testo libero

18. 18.
    Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.

    Katsoulis J, Pazera P, Mericske-Stern R. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11(3):238-45

    151 citazioni PubMed 18783423 doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00110.x

19. 19.
    Three-dimensional plotting and printing of an implant drilling guide: simplifying guided implant surgery.

    Flügge TV, Nelson K, Schmelzeisen R, et al. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71(8):1340-6

    145 citazioni PubMed 23866950 doi:10.1016/j.joms.2013.04.010

20. 20.
    Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients.

    Pettersson A, Komiyama A, Hultin M, et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(4):527-37

    145 citazioni PubMed 20491812 doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00285.x

21. 21.
    The accuracy of computer guided implant surgery with tooth supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study.

    Derksen W, Wismeijer D, Flügge TV, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(10):1005-1015

    140 citazioni PubMed 31330566 doi:10.1111/clr.13514

22. 22.
    Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention.

    Tatakis D, Chien H, Parashis A. Periodontology 2000. 2019;81(1):194-208

    134 citazioni PubMed 31407433 doi:10.1111/prd.12292

23. 23.
    Influence of surgical-guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer Assisted Implant Surgery.

    Kholy KE, Lazarin R, Janner SFM, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(11):1067-1075

    133 citazioni PubMed 31381178 doi:10.1111/clr.13520

24. 24.
    Reducing errors in guided implant surgery to optimize treatment outcomes.

    Chackartchi T, Romanos G, Párkányi L, et al. Periodontology 2000. 2022;88(1):64-72

    121 citazioni PubMed 35103317 doi:10.1111/prd.12411 testo libero

25. 25.
    A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery - data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing

    Kernen F, Kramer J, Wanner L, et al. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20

    117 citazioni PubMed 32912273 doi:10.1186/s12903-020-01208-1 testo libero

26. 26.
    Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery.

    Koop R, Vercruyssen M, Vermeulen K, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(6):630-4

    113 citazioni PubMed 22413853 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02436.x testo libero

27. 27.
    Artificial Intelligence and Augmented Reality for Guided Implant Surgery Planning: a Proof of Concept.

    Mangano F, Admakin O, Lerner H, et al. E -journal of dentistry. 2023:104485

    107 citazioni PubMed 36965859 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104485

28. 28.
    Comparison of the accuracy of implant position for two-implants supported fixed dental prosthesis using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

    Yimarj P, Subbalekha K, Dhanesuan K, et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(6):672-678

    101 citazioni PubMed 32939934 doi:10.1111/cid.12949

Gli ultimi tre anni

Cosa è uscito di recente, ordinato per quanto è già stato citato.

29. 29.
    Artificial Intelligence and Augmented Reality for Guided Implant Surgery Planning: a Proof of Concept.

    Mangano F, Admakin O, Lerner H, et al. J Dent. 2023;133:104485

    107 citazioni PubMed 36965859 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104485

30. 30.
    Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

    Jain S, Sayed ME, Ibraheem WI, et al. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;60(1)

    56 citazioni PubMed 38276045 doi:10.3390/medicina60010011 testo libero

31. 31.
    Accuracy of implant placement with combined use of static and dynamic Computer Assisted Implant Surgery in single tooth space: a randomized controlled trial.

    Yotpibulwong T, Arunjaroensuk S, Kaboosaya B, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(4):330-341

    55 citazioni PubMed 36756684 doi:10.1111/clr.14043 testo libero

32. 32.
    Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study.

    Wang W, Xu H, Mei D, et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023;26(2):309-316

    49 citazioni PubMed 37728030 doi:10.1111/cid.13278

33. 33.
    Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study: Accuracy of static vs. dynamic CAIS.

    Otaghsara SST, Joda T, Thieringer F. J Dent. 2023;132:104487

    47 citazioni PubMed 36948382 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104487 testo libero

34. 34.
    Accuracy of implant placement via dynamic navigation and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery methods: A retrospective study.

    Zhang S, Cai Q, Chen W, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;35(2):220-229

    41 citazioni PubMed 38033198 doi:10.1111/clr.14216

35. 35.
    Effect of the number and distribution of fiducial markers on the accuracy of robot-guided implant surgery in edentulous mandibular arches: An in vitro study.

    Zhao Y, Liao Y, Wu X, et al. J Dent. 2023;134:104529

    38 citazioni PubMed 37105431 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104529

36. 36.
    Dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery for completely edentulous patients. A proof of a concept.

    Pomares-Puig C, Sánchez-Garcés M, Jorba-García A. J Dent. 2023;130:104443

    32 citazioni PubMed 36720424 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104443 testo libero

37. 37.
    Accuracy of navigation guided implant surgery for immediate loading complete arch restorations: Prospective clinical trial.

    Pozzi A, Carosi P, Laureti A, et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024;26(5):954-971

    31 citazioni PubMed 38967100 doi:10.1111/cid.13360 testo libero

38. 38.
    Influence of Alveolar Ridge Morphology and Guide-hole Design on the Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery with two Implant Macro-designs: An in Vitro Study.

    Dulla FA, Couso-Queiruga E, Chappuis V, et al. J Dent. 2023;130:104426

    31 citazioni PubMed 36652971 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104426 testo libero